"This is one of many differences between Matthew and Luke which reflect the differences in their sources and/or the goals they had for their compositions (i.e., the ideas they wanted to get across to their readers)."
See this is a huge problem for me.
Most christians {especailly around here} insist and demand that the bible is the true word of god and not the word of man. I forget who posted it here that man is only a physical being that god used to put pen to paper and that man had no say in what god made their hand write.
However, you are saing that man wrote it of his own free will and that god had no part in what is written other than the men believed in god and Jesus.
To paraphrase several posts from this site, "there is only one truth". So who is wrong?
See this is a huge problem for me.
Most christians {especailly around here} insist and demand that the bible is the true word of god and not the word of man. I forget who posted it here that man is only a physical being that god used to put pen to paper and that man had no say in what god made their hand write.
However, you are saing that man wrote it of his own free will and that god had no part in what is written other than the men believed in god and Jesus.
To paraphrase several posts from this site, "there is only one truth". So who is wrong?
