The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke - Contradictions - All - The Skeptic's Annotated Bible Discussion Board - Message Board - Yuku

RSS
Email

0 Kudo

Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Author	Comment
KitsuneNineTailed	Re: Matthew's Simplification & Joseph's Father	#1	[url]	[-]
Posts: 2069 08/05/05 08:38:40	You know with just the sheer number of interpretations, confusing meanings, and dizzying possibilities you bring up about the bible it is no small wonder that ANYone can agree to what ANYthing in the bible actually means. And you say this is a book we should base our whole life, society, culture, and legal system off of? DAMN! If we were to use the bible for our legal system, there'd be NO way of knowing who was guilty and who not, because people like Waterrock could spin an interpretation that would turn them from murderer to saint. Ciao! -------------- "Just remember it's the birds that's supposed to suffer, not the hunter." - George W. Bush advising quail hunter and New Mexico Sen. Pete Domenici, Roswell, N.M., Jan. 22, 2004
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
David	Re: Matthew's Simplification & Joseph's Father	#2	[url]	[-]
Posts: 161 08/05/05 17:54:12	Understanding Jesus lineage is not a requirement for having a relationship with him. People dont even know their own spouses lineage before they make the decision of mirage. The Bible is a book about the kingdom of God, past and present. As with any history book it requires study. What is wonderfully different is that we have the Holy Spirit to lead, guide and direct. "I was a young man with unformed ideas. I threw out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time over everything, and to my astonishment, the ideas took like wildfire. People made a religion of them."-C.R. Darwin "It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and Bible."-G. Washington "May God keep you, and may we, all of us, keep God."-R. Reagan
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Malkut	Re: Matthew's Simplification & Joseph's Father	#3	[url]	[-]
Posts: 6926 08/05/05 18:56:43	*Quote:* Understanding Jesus lineage is not a requirement for having a relationship with him. I beg to differ. I'm not giving anyone 10% of anything unless I know they have good breeding. If Jesus really came from a line began when some drunken sot diddled his two little girls by the smoking ruins of their old city, well, let's just say I've known people with family histories like that, and in my experience, Jesus could probably qualify for welfare, rather then having my money. Often a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and the other parts of the world, about the motions and orbits of the stars and even their sizes and distances, . . . and this knowledge he holds with certainty from reason and experience. It is thus offensive and disgraceful for an unbeliever to hear a Christian talk nonsense about such things, claiming that what he is saying is based in Scripture. We should do all that we can to avoid such an embarrassing situation, lest the unbeliever see only ignorance in the Christian and laugh to scorn." - St. Augustine, "De Genesi ad litteram libri duodecim" quote, criticize quote, criticize What kind of malevolent disease are you? -One of Dickweed Zero's Alternate Personalities
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Quick Reply

Replies

The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	08/04/05 06:33:19	Waterrock
And Jacob begat Joseph	08/04/05 08:31:32	Steve Wells
Matthew's Simplification & Joseph's Father	08/05/05 00:08:53	Waterrock
Re: Matthew's Simplification & Joseph's Father	08/05/05 08:38:40	KitsuneNineTailed
Re: Matthew's Simplification & Joseph's Father	08/05/05 17:54:12	David
Re: Matthew's Simplification & Joseph's Father	08/05/05 18:56:43	Malkut
Who was Joseph's father?	08/05/05 09:15:20	Steve Wells
Re: Who was Joseph's father?	08/05/05 20:30:52	Waterrock
And Salmon begat Booz	08/05/05 21:32:06	Steve Wells
Salmon, father of Boaz	08/08/05 07:07:07	Waterrock
Who was Joseph's father?	08/09/05 16:48:37	Steve Wells
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	08/09/05 20:54:01	raphjd
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	11/21/05 23:31:11	Yark Hutprancer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	11/22/05 03:22:01	Yark Hutprancer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	12/10/05 21:00:35	Diskeyezed
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	12/11/05 05:07:57	Yark Hutprancer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	11/23/05 21:46:31	zipkikr1966
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	11/24/05 00:53:28	Yark Hutprancer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	11/24/05 06:45:52	Keith and Company
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	12/10/05 20:17:21	Rev Etherman
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	12/10/05 21:10:53	Diskeyezed
"not erronious"?	03/21/07 08:18:13	Vampire LOGOS
Re: "not erroneous"?	03/21/07 08:23:14	Keith and Company
How the hell do people find 1.5-year-old threads?!?	03/22/07 19:28:50	corwin17
Why do people object to posting in old threads?	03/23/07 12:24:24	Rambo123UK
Re: "not erronious"?	12/17/07 07:40:46	FrigateSkimmer
Re: "not erronious"?	12/17/07 07:53:57	Keith and Company
Re: "not erronious"?	12/23/07 19:55:06	FrigateSkimmer
Re: "not erronious"?	12/23/07 20:23:45	Hawker Hurricane
Re: "not erronious"?	12/23/07 21:15:07	Keith and Company
Re: "not erronious"?	12/24/07 08:41:18	FrigateSkimmer
Re: "not erronious"?	12/24/07 09:40:42	Argy Lacedom
Re: "not erronious"?	12/24/07 12:43:50	FrigateSkimmer
Re: "not erronious"?	12/24/07 15:54:45	Argy Lacedom
Re: "not erronious"?	12/24/07 22:06:25	Yark Hutprancer
Re: "not erroneous"? (we'll finally spell it right	12/25/07 13:08:26	FrigateSkimmer
Re: "not erroneous"? (we'll finally spell it right	12/25/07 21:48:08	1skybluepink
Re: "not erroneous"? (we'll finally spell it right	12/25/07 22:24:46	Argy Lacedom
Re: "not erroneous"? (we'll finally spell it right	12/26/07 18:52:44	Yark Hutprancer
"not erroneous?"	04/04/08 18:13:45	FrigateSkimmer
God and Risk	04/05/08 11:33:32	Argy Lacedom
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	04/05/08 13:08:38	corwin17
Re: "not erronious"?	12/17/07 10:46:48	Svlad Cjelli
Re: "not erronious"?	12/17/07 10:51:35	Keith and Company
Re: "not erronious"?	12/23/07 20:34:27	FrigateSkimmer
Re: "not erronious"?	12/17/07 11:57:14	Keith and Company
Re: "not erronious"?	12/22/07 11:33:32	FastHack
The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	03/21/07 08:44:43	Vampire LOGOS
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	03/23/07 21:40:05	Rev Etherman
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	03/26/07 02:24:10	Calinacase
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	03/26/07 22:11:28	Rev Etherman
Why a genealolgy in the first place?	04/01/08 08:31:48	briansnat
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	04/01/08 10:48:13	Hawker Hurricane
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	05/11/08 16:00:45	FrigateSkimmer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	05/12/08 01:35:30	Argy Lacedom
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	05/11/08 16:01:58	FrigateSkimmer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	05/12/08 20:02:17	corwin17
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	06/27/08 10:41:57	FrigateSkimmer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	06/27/08 10:52:43	FrigateSkimmer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	06/30/08 17:23:59	Argy Lacedom
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	05/18/08 18:04:59	Jenth101
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	06/27/08 08:50:39	FrigateSkimmer
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	06/27/08 10:43:52	Rambo123UK
Re: The Genealogies in Matthew and Luke	06/28/08 05:53:10	Jenth101
I thought I'd post this here	05/22/08 02:27:44	Rambo123UK
Serpent - literal vs. symbolic	06/27/08 05:48:20	FrigateSkimmer