Quontir wrote:
Argy Lacedom wrote:
Oh come off it Daystar. Even you must be tiring of the constant need to reinvent the meaning of words to suit your predetermined view of what the bible should say.
In this case I just don't see that it matters.
Even if the lake which burneth with fire is some sort of wacky code for eternal destruction it is still intolerant to submit the "fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars" to eternal destruction. Or in other words genocide via burning and torture is horrible, but that doesn't suddenly make genocide by simple destruction any better.
To Argy, I don't see the need to reinvent anything. If it were up to my reinvention it would defeat the purpose.
To Quontir, what we are really talking about is the choice of a huge group of people who say, through their actions, that they don't want to be a part of life everlasting and would rather get into some mischeif with Satan and go out with a bang. In a manner of speaking. They would rather die than spend eternity with Jehovah and his faithful servants. Wouldn't you think it more cruel to force those people to live in a way they don't want to, or the destruction of everything else due to their transgressions?
The Bible tells what happened with the first death. The skeptic wrongly acuses God of the death and destruction caused by this, but what if there were no second death. The question Adam's sin raised and the effects of sin demonstrates that there would be destruction of the earth and all of mankind.





