And the adding to the book... well if the New testament said that, then the new testament wouldnt be included. but ok, forget that part. thats alright. but, How come there are documents to prove that the Old and New Testaments are not simply made up for whatever purposes (and dont say their arent. the fact that they were all written at different times by different authors proves this) but there is no proof of the tablets that Joseph Smith found at all? And if Jesus saves sins for all times, but if you're a mormon you get a better place in heaven, why would God not institute the book of Mormon whenever it happened? instead of waiting a good 1800 years.
As a matter of fact, there is no proof of any of the tribes or anything in the book of Mormon. No traces of any of them. thats kinda odd dont you think? while archaeologists are discovering all these old testament cities and artifacts, the book of Mormon has not been verified by anything at all. Just Joseph Smith's word. who by the way was not afraid in the presence of an angel, when anyone else who had ever seen one was terrified? i dont think so.
