I was adding in multiples of 1000 instead of 100. When you corrected me the first time I didn't even see the difference, hence my words. It was a mathematics error on my part, I've already admitted that fact. If I had a problem with millenniums and centuries that has nothing to do with the rest of what I said.
Furthermore, a book being accurate to the word before it was written is a logical error. That doesn't make any sense and shows that there is a genuine mistake from the author. Why you assumed that I meant that the book was written before it was makes no sense to me. That's something you've attributed to me and had nothing to do with the point I was addressing about god's word not being changed.
On an extra note, if I did mean that the book was written 15,000 years ago that would go against everything the book stands for, I.e. being written as soon as the word's left Mohammed's lips. How could that happen before the existence of the book. That would only be another contradiction. Not a good thing as you seem to think it would be.
