The language that Matthew uses, "fulfilled that which was spoken," clearly shows that he is presenting the slaughter as a fulfillment of predictive prophecy, not a typological pattern.
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Franciscan Monkey |
Re: Matthew 2:17-18 - Weeping in Ramah | #1 | ||
|
The language that Matthew uses, "fulfilled that which was spoken," clearly shows that he is presenting the slaughter as a fulfillment of predictive prophecy, not a typological pattern.
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Matthew 2:17-18 - Weeping in Ramah | 08/10/05 21:48:55 | Waterrock |
| Re: Matthew 2:17-18 - Weeping in Ramah | 11/04/05 15:49:23 | Franciscan Monkey |
| Re: Matthew 2:17-18 - Weeping in Ramah | 01/07/06 14:05:12 | Rev Etherman |
| Re: Matthew 2:17-18 - Weeping in Ramah | 05/31/06 19:40:58 | Clara Listensprechen |
| Re: Matthew 2:17-18 - Weeping in Ramah | 06/07/06 21:21:28 | Rev Etherman |