Quote:
Matthew 19:12 says nothing that relates to receiving "it" as a sexual connotation. The receiving is of the message.
I, uh, see nothing at all to show that Steve is indicating that 'it' is a sexual reference.
Steve's comments center on the idea that you should make yourself a eunuch the better to recieve the kingdom of heaven.

Quote:
And those men that do not mary for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven would obviously relate to Preists or the like, just as a nun does the same for the fairer gender.
Well, we see that Nearfront is not a catholic. Nuns are married to Jesus.

Quote:
As for those that were born that way or because men made them that way, it COULD relate to those that dedicate themselves to war, insane criminals, trans-gender Republicans etc, etc.
Why, again, does anyone say that what's written in plain text is not the meaning of the text? Those born 'that way' would be those that are infertile from a birth defect. Autoeunuchs, not castrated or vasectimated or wearing of great amounts of mascara. Dedicating ones self to war does not make you a eunuch. Been in too many liberty ports to buy that idea.

Quote:
Then again it may just relate to those responsible for this web-site, those males who will never get married because every time they try to get laid, they're laughed off because their dicks are so tiny.
And nearfront has a reading comprehension problem. I knew inside of a couple of days that there was only one person responsible for this website, and he's married.

It's amazing that everyone expresses scorn the same way.

A number of people that have read my fetish porn figure that since i write about Lilliputian women, i must have a tiny dick. Tiny partners would be the only ones i could satisfy.

Others have read my Brobdingragian scenes and figure that i find women so dominating, it must mean i have a tiny dick.

Now, as a supporter of the website, i must have a tiny dick because i'm a god hating atheist...

What other reasons have we seen for people on the other side of the phosphor screen to diagnose the volume of my manhood?
I mean, aside from those that interpret feminism as proof that i'm a lesbian. It's a similar theme, though, in that it's so tiny it's become the opposite.

I'm bald, is that because of dickus minus?