Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake - Absurdities - All - The Skeptic's Annotated Bible Discussion Board - Message Board - Yuku

RSS
Email

0 Kudo

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Author	Comment
Argy Lacedom	Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	#1	[url]	[-]
Posts: 3177 10/07/05 20:36:19	*Quote:* the usual understanding of the third group is non-literal; I actually understand the WHOLE of the bible that way. There is no way of discriminating which bits to pick and choose as literal, myth or parable, other than to use the prejudice of the reader. The intellectually honest approach is to take it as fiction unless proof of the contrary can be produced. ________________________________________________________________________ I can't imagine a higher being throwing anyone into eternal torment for not worshipping him, anymore than I can imagine a loving parent throwing their baby in the oven for not understanding complex physics. - Casandra Blake
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
nearfront	Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	#2	[url]	[-]
Posts: 1 09/05/06 17:47:15	Waterrock has again exposed another calculated attempt to twist the Lord's word by this web site's author. Matthew 19:12 says nothing that relates to receiving "it" as a sexual connotation. The receiving is of the message. And those men that do not mary for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven would obviously relate to Preists or the like, just as a nun does the same for the fairer gender. As for those that were born that way or because men made them that way, it COULD relate to those that dedicate themselves to war, insane criminals, trans-gender Republicans etc, etc. Then again it may just relate to those responsible for this web-site, those males who will never get married because every time they try to get laid, they're laughed off because their dicks are so tiny. And who said Christians were narrow minded, humorless prunes? (Not that little dick finds it funny)
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Yark Hutprancer	Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	#3	[url]	[-]
Posts: 4032 09/05/06 23:24:58	Fuck off, you shithead. Die a fiery death. "[...] if there is an afterlife where justice will be served at last and everyone will get what they deserve, why bother instituting any sort of earthly justice? Why fight an evil dictator or imprison a criminal if he'll eventually get what's coming to him anyway? Why try to help the poor or the disadvantaged if they will be rewarded later for their suffering now? The supposed inescapability of divine justice renders human justice superfluous." - Ebon Musings: The Atheism Pages, The Ineffable Carrot and the Infinite Stick
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
1skybluepink	Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	#4	[url]	[-]
Posts: 842 09/08/06 05:31:15	"Then again it may just relate to those responsible for this web-site, those males who will never get married because every time they try to get laid, they're laughed off because their dicks are so tiny." What a fascinating comment from one presum(ptuous/ablly) 'holier than them': to speak of 'getting laid' BEFORE mentioning marriage. Is that they way you 'True Christians' go about things? I've noticed that real men never feel a need to hold pissing contests or talk about other guy's equipment....... I do so agree with your comment I've quoted above, though! Of course, I figure 'those responsible for this web-site' would be all the expletive-deleted fundy fringies/paranoid conspiracy theorists/zero-sum 'philospphers' like your poor sick twisted self. I'll be praying for you.......
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote
Keith and Company	Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	#5	[url]	[-]
Posts: 4203 09/08/06 05:51:42	*Quote:* Matthew 19:12 says nothing that relates to receiving "it" as a sexual connotation. The receiving is of the message. I, uh, see nothing at all to show that Steve is indicating that 'it' is a sexual reference. Steve's comments center on the idea that you should make yourself a eunuch the better to recieve the kingdom of heaven. *Quote:* And those men that do not mary for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven would obviously relate to Preists or the like, just as a nun does the same for the fairer gender. Well, we see that Nearfront is not a catholic. Nuns are married to Jesus. *Quote:* As for those that were born that way or because men made them that way, it COULD relate to those that dedicate themselves to war, insane criminals, trans-gender Republicans etc, etc. Why, again, does anyone say that what's written in plain text is not the meaning of the text? Those born 'that way' would be those that are infertile from a birth defect. Autoeunuchs, not castrated or vasectimated or wearing of great amounts of mascara. Dedicating ones self to war does not make you a eunuch. Been in too many liberty ports to buy that idea. *Quote:* Then again it may just relate to those responsible for this web-site, those males who will never get married because every time they try to get laid, they're laughed off because their dicks are so tiny. And nearfront has a reading comprehension problem. I knew inside of a couple of days that there was only one person responsible for this website, and he's married. It's amazing that everyone expresses scorn the same way. A number of people that have read my fetish porn figure that since i write about Lilliputian women, i must have a tiny dick. Tiny partners would be the only ones i could satisfy. Others have read my Brobdingragian scenes and figure that i find women so dominating, it must mean i have a tiny dick. Now, as a supporter of the website, i must have a tiny dick because i'm a god hating atheist... What other reasons have we seen for people on the other side of the phosphor screen to diagnose the volume of my manhood? I mean, aside from those that interpret feminism as proof that i'm a lesbian. It's a similar theme, though, in that it's so tiny it's become the opposite. I'm bald, is that because of dickus minus?
Interact My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Invite Blocking Ignore User's Posts	Reply Quote

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Quick Reply

Replies

Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	10/05/05 12:30:24	Waterrock
Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	10/05/05 13:20:31	Yark Hutprancer
Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	10/07/05 20:36:19	Argy Lacedom
Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	09/05/06 17:47:15	nearfront
Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	09/05/06 23:24:58	Yark Hutprancer
Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	09/08/06 05:31:15	1skybluepink
Re: Matthew 19:10-12 - Eunuchs For Heaven's Sake	09/08/06 05:51:42	Keith and Company