| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Yark Hutprancer
|
Hot Christian Sex! |
Lead | ||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Argy Lacedom |
#1 | |||
|
Wow, that's brilliant. I always thought the bible could be used to justify anything - you've shown me the light Yak - alleluia!
What the question boils down to is this...
Is a thing good because god commands it or does god command it because it is good?
If the former, then the believer must accept that god could make murdering children good. If the latter, then the believer must accept that we have no
need of god for moral instruction.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Quontir |
Up next bestiality... | #2 | ||
|
....You know because Adam was all alone in that garden so if you're pure in Christ, then you too can make it with the poodle.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Yark Hutprancer |
#3 | |||
|
Yeah, it's a perfect example of how a text can be read any way you want to read it.
Not only is it sexy, but it's totally sexist too, just like the BIBLE! How fucked up is it that this Christian man gets the pleasure of being with two sexy women, but if a woman wants to be with two sexy men, FUCK YOU!? Women always get fucked by the bible. I really hope that is a parody site. |
||||
|
|
||||
Keith and Company |
#4 | |||
|
Can't get there from work...is this the site that says homosexual behavior is incredibly wrong, unless it's the wife and a woman doing it for the
purpose of exciting the husband?
Then god loves him a little M/F/F action. |
||||
|
|
||||
Yark Hutprancer |
#5 | |||
|
You got it. Pretty damned progressive interpretation for an Abrahamic religion. Daddy likes!
|
||||
|
|
||||
twillight |
#6 | |||
|
I read some of it (it is too good to waste for just one time, and that tells something!), and it is hilarious! Yeah, this is the material we need. Perfect
logic, insane content.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Keith and Company |
#7 | |||
|
Oh, yeah.
(2) Both women involved in the threesome must be willing to keep within traditional female roles (i.e., not taking on masculine appearance or behavior in or out of the bedroom) and recognize the male as the leader in the relationship.Never sure if he meant women wearing trousers or women wearing a strap-on dildo. |
||||
|
|
||||
Keith and Company |
#8 | |||
|
Oh, yeah.
(2) Both women involved in the threesome must be willing to keep within traditional female roles (i.e., not taking on masculine appearance or behavior in or out of the bedroom) and recognize the male as the leader in the relationship.Never sure if he meant women wearing trousers or women wearing a strap-on dildo. |
||||
|
|
||||
twillight |
#9 | |||
|
No trouserts, that's for sure.
The behaviour must mean, she can not force the male to do anything. About the dildo, ask them. I'm not sure wether that falls into the homosexual cathegory, or not. |
||||
|
|
||||
| Hot Christian Sex! | 06/19/09 02:17:24 | Yark Hutprancer |
| Re: Hot Christian Sex! | 06/19/09 04:32:07 | Argy Lacedom |
| Re: Hot Christian Sex! | 06/19/09 06:06:02 | Yark Hutprancer |
| Up next bestiality... | 06/19/09 06:00:07 | Quontir |
| Re: Hot Christian Sex! | 06/19/09 06:13:32 | Keith and Company |
| Re: Hot Christian Sex! | 06/19/09 06:32:00 | Yark Hutprancer |
| Re: Hot Christian Sex! | 06/21/09 11:14:47 | twillight |
| Re: Hot Christian Sex! | 06/21/09 11:43:45 | Keith and Company |
| Re: Hot Christian Sex! | 06/21/09 11:44:11 | Keith and Company |
| Re: Hot Christian Sex! | 06/22/09 00:22:54 | twillight |