<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Second coming- problems</title>
        <link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4276/t/Second-coming-problems.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Second coming- problems


On asked if Jews expect another prophet, Jewish response is: No, not specifically. But also that if a prophet does come, he will be known immidiately. But they
do not expect another Jesus, one was too many for them.

Do the muslims expect second coming? No. For them Isa did not die, therefore it is blasphemy to talk of his return. That in fact has been a big bone of
contention too.

Do Buddhists expect a saviour? No, they do not belive in saviours, but Buddha might... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:28:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47175/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47175</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <span style="font-weight: bold;">I&#39;m not sure if Sirens of Titan is filmable. How would you depict Salo from Tralthamadore? It has a Martian invasion and a
sea of girl statues on Titan.
<br>
<br></span>i think in our CG age, most of those things could be done.  i think it&#39;s unfilmable for the same reason most of vonnegut is - stream of
consciousness books don&#39;t translate to film very well (catch 22 was another that didn&#39;t quite make the leap).  they did a fair job with... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jeff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47175</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47174/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">jeff wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  i was a bit surprised to learn that the rights to &#39;sirens of titan&#39; were held by jerry garcia until his death. now there&#39;s a film i&#39;d like to
  see.
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I apologise but I think i made a mistake when I suggested all book/ film  rights were owned by Willis &amp; Nolte.   It depends in who published the book. From
memory, &quot;Sirens of Titan&quot; is his second book after &quot;piano... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthew Ellard)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47174</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47173/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47173</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ i was a bit surprised to learn that the rights to &#39;sirens of titan&#39; were held by jerry garcia until his death.  now there&#39;s a film i&#39;d like to
see.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jeff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47173</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47172/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47172</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Daystar wrote:</strong> When I checked out the Ballard Wiki link I thought that he might have had something to do with Crash, one
  of my all time fovorite films, but that is a different Crash. I will check out the Slaughterhouse Five, it sounds like it might be good. It was made in 1972?
  I did a search and the listed it as Slaugterhouse Five (1972) which usually means there were earlier or later versions, but I didn&#39;t see any in my search... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthew Ellard)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47172</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47168/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Matthew Ellard wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">Daystar wrote:</strong>  Another good movie in my collection is Speilberg&#39;s Empire Of The Son with a young Christian Bale.
    The story of James Graham, a young Briton in a Japanese internment camp. He has touble with which side he is on or more importantly, which side he can
    relate to the most. British, American, Chinese or Japanese. To me it is an... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Daystar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47168</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:56:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47167/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Daystar wrote:</strong>  Another good movie in my collection is Speilberg&#39;s Empire Of The Son with a young Christian Bale.
  The story of James Graham, a young Briton in a Japanese internment camp. He has touble with which side he is on or more importantly, which side he can relate
  to the most. British, American, Chinese or Japanese. To me it is an interesting commentary on political divisions of the human race.
</blockquote>This is a brilliant... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthew Ellard)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47167</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:29:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47138/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47138</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Matthew Ellard wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">Argy Lacedom wrote:</strong> If God made us the way we are then he is responsible for our acts. If a scientist created a virus
    capable of causing death and suuffering in the world is it the fault of the virus or the fault of the scientist?
    <br>
  </blockquote>Dear Argy,  you have described the premise for Stanlry Kubrick&#39;s movie A.I.    In that film... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Daystar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47138</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47125/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47125</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  Why is it that these same people are against laws against private ownership of assault weapons? Why are these people comfortable with gun jackoffs collecting
  weapons of mass killing?
</blockquote>I assume they need the assult weapons to kill those who their god hates. Best keep them legal then. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Quontir)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47125</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47105/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47105</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Argy Lacedom wrote:</strong> If God made us the way we are then he is responsible for our acts. If a scientist created a virus
  capable of causing death and suuffering in the world is it the fault of the virus or the fault of the scientist?
  <br>
</blockquote>Dear Argy,  you have described the premise for Stanlry Kubrick&#39;s movie A.I.    In that film humans create a little boy robot that loves humans
and &quot;must be with his mother&quot;.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthew Ellard)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47105</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:02:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47104/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47104</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I`m puzzled by your contradictory opinion here Daystar.
<br>
<br>
In another thread on human sacrifice(a bad thing,right?), you stated,&quot; <strong>Daystar</strong> - <span style="font-weight: bold;">Jehovah would not have
allowed</span> someone to make a human sacrifice. &quot;You must not learn to do according to the detestable things of those nations. There should not be found
in you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire . . . For everybody doing these things is... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wickle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47104</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:44:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47103/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47103</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <em><strong>Daystar:
  <br></strong></em>
  <hr>
  <em>Lets say that there was once upon a time when rape was thought to be good by most people and God decided to put an end to it by a flood. Everyone who
  thought that rape and murder was good was left to the flood. Would that have been good in your eyes?</em>
</blockquote>No it would not be good.  Murder is never a good solution to changing peoples&#39; minds.  There are many alteratives available to an omnipotent
being other... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Argy Lacedom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47103</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:41:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47013/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47013</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Absolutely! These people ought to be fighting for the death penalty for abortion doctors.
<br>
<br>
Here something that bothers me, though. Why is it that these same people are against laws against private ownership of assault weapons? Why are these people
comfortable with gun jackoffs collecting weapons of mass killing? When I read that Sarah palin was against the ban of private assault weapon ownership, I was
like &quot;what the fuck?&quot; Isn&#39;t this a woman with kids? Even my... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Yark Hutprancer)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47013</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47009/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47009</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>A question here:
<br>
<br>
If people share all the premises about life beginning at conception and a microscopic fertilized egg being the moral equivalent of an adult human being and
that God himself considers the act of aborting that fertilized egg to be murder, doesn&#39;t it seem disingenuous to say &quot;Let&#39;s not get too excited
about this, we must settle for a few signs and chants and letters to the editor because the government says women have a right to choose abortion.&quot;... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Quontir)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47009</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:54:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47004/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47004</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If abortion was as terrible as christians try to make it out to be, if making sure that every conception gets to be born is so critical, then a capable god
would make sure that those fetuses would survive. There would be no such thing as spontaneous miscarriage. All attempts at abortion would fail. There would be
no need for anti-abortion legislation. Ever. It would be like a gardener watching his garden for rabbits. If the gardener were capable, not a single turnip
would be harmed, and a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Yark Hutprancer)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47004</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47003/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47003</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Daystar wrote: </strong> Lets say that there was once upon a time when rape was thought to be good by most people and God decided
  to put an end to it by a flood. Everyone who thought that rape and murder was good was left to the flood. Would that have been good in your eyes? 
  <br>
  <br>
  <font color="#0000CC">This is a ridiculous question.  This mythical &quot;God&quot; kills everyone in a flood, including those who approve or do not approve... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Matthew Ellard)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47003</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/47002/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-47002</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Daystar wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  First of all, there was never supposed to be a second coming. And second the misunderstandings about a second coming in the lifetime of the apostles I dealt
  with <a target="_blank" href="http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4254">here</a>.
</blockquote>
<br>
Very true. There was not supposed to be second coming. ost likely explanation is Jesus did not know what he was saying in Matt 24.34. Or Matthew was LYING.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rcscwc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/47002</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:28:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/46994/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-46994</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Daystar,
<br>
Whether or not God&#39;s law is the work of God or man his law states rape is punishable by death.
<br>
Quontir,
<br>
Read your bible more closely. According to it women are chattel and if you make sure she doesn&#39;t cry out you can own her and continue your rape every day
after you are wed.
<br>
<br>
<br>
To top it off, the woman gets stoned to death for being raped, in the city,having been unable to cry out loud enough to be heard. Crap! Cover her mouth, rape
her , and run.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wickle)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/46994</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/46984/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-46984</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  Would that have been good in your eyes?
</blockquote>Did it include killing little children who couldn&#39;t possible have thought those things? What about all the animals that never thought a moment
about such things?
<br>
<br>
If it did then it was the most abominable action ever done.
<br>

<blockquote>
  Then who is to blame? God or man?
</blockquote>The person who crafts something is responsible for any flaws, thus if God created man than any flaws in Man are entirely... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Quontir)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/46984</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/46979/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-46979</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Argy, your apparent philosophical exercise projects a conclusion out of ignorance and shortsightedness. As they often do.
<br>
<br>

<blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Argy wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Yep, rape is good too - as long as god stands by and lets it happen. After all, he is powerful enough to intervene if he doesn&#39;t like that sort of thing.
  The fact that he allows it must mean he likes it.
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Lets say that there was once upon a time when rape was... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Daystar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/46979</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:39:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/46975/t/Second-coming-problems.html#reply-46975</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yes. It is important that we let all people act with completely free-will, unless we hear they might have WMDs. Then, we preemptively attack them with guns and
bombs.
<br>
<br>
The free-will answer is nothing but an excuse for believers to believe in a god that clearly is not there. There is no sense in it at all. A good person
protects children from kidnappers if he can, free-will be damned. If the biblegod exists, he is not a good person.
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Yark Hutprancer)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/46975</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Second coming- problems ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4276/t/Second-coming-problems.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Second coming- problems</p>

<p><br>
On asked if Jews expect another prophet, Jewish response is: No, not specifically. But also that if a prophet does come, he will be known immidiately. But they
do not expect another Jesus, one was too many for them.</p>

<p>Do the muslims expect second coming? No. For them Isa did not die, therefore it is blasphemy to talk of his return. That in fact has been a big bone of
contention too.</p>

<p>Do Buddhists expect a saviour? No, they do not belive in... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (rcscwc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/4276</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:46:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>