Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/2951/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:47:10 GMT Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:35:07 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/2951/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26567/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26567
Quote:
In 367 A.D., Bishop Athanasius of Alexandria issued a decree banning all scriptures not explicitly approved by the central Church authorities.


I guess this was done so that the rejected books wouldn't be around to conflict with the "approved" version of the bible.


"If Homosexuals... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (raphjd) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26567 Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:35:07 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26566/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26566
Quote:
Why? What evidence do you have that the question of the canon even came up at Nicea? And, not only why, but /how/?


Countless objective books dating before and after "The Da Vinci Code" was written.

You on the other hand have to believe that the bible is untouched or it would ruin your beliefs.

feeds@yuku.com (raphjd) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26566 Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:25:48 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26565/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26565
R: "I think those 4 were already considered important so there wasn't much debate on them. I do believe that things were edited in those 4 at this time."

Why? What evidence do you have that the question of the canon even came up at Nicea? And, not only why, but /how/? I am wondering, for instance, how the Gospel of Luke and the Gospel of John were edited in 325, since there's a papyrus copy (Papyrus 75) of those two books in existence, produced in the late... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Waterrock) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26565 Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:12:29 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26564/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26564
Quote:
That is not true. Someone has been lying to you. What do you propose as evidence that the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were chosen by committee in 325?


I think those 4 were already considered important so there wasn't much debate on them. I do believe that things were edited in those 4 at this... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (raphjd) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26564 Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:05:58 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26563/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26563
(We're pretty far away from the Quran now, but...)

When you were asked the question "Weren't the Gospels you have in the Bible today were chosen by committee?" you answered "YES, at the First Ecumenical {sp?} Council in 325 AD."

That is not true. Someone has been lying to you. What do you propose as evidence that the Gospel of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were chosen by committee in 325?

Yours in Christ,

Waterrock
]]> feeds@yuku.com (Waterrock) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26563 Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:06:48 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26569/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26569
Quote:
Muratorian Fragment


www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/ReligionTheology/BiblicalStudies/NewTestament/?view=usa&ci=0198263414

 feeds@yuku.com (raphjd) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26569 Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:45:33 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26568/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26568
Quote:
it looks like the people whom Muhammad regarded as "Christians" taught an exalted form of Mary-exaltation, and treated an image of Jesus and Mary like an idol, and had some other unorthodox beliefs.


You mean Catholics, right? They are the ones that worship Mary the Mother.

Quote:
No. There's... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (raphjd) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26568 Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:32:43 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26562/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26562
Quote:

Weren't the Gospels you have in the Bible today were chosen by committee?


YES, at the First Ecumenical {sp?} Council in 325 AD.

Quote:
It seems that other Christians chose other Gospels.


The "other christians" were murdered for holding a... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (raphjd) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26562 Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:22:29 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26561/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26561 Thank you for answering my questions. I looked up bishop Irenaeus and the Gospels.
Quote:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel

An insistence upon a canonical four, and no others, was a central theme of Irenaeus of Lyons, c. 185. In his central work, Adversus Haereses... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (FireGarden) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26561 Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:16:24 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26560/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26560
FG: "Can I ask who you're using as a source of commentary/interpretation? Are you talking to Muslims while you read the Quran?"

I'm accessing various online Islamic commentaries and hadith-collections.

FG: "I'm interested in why you think that the Christians in Arabia at the time of Mohammed were "pseudo-Christians"."

After the Council of Ephesus (431) the Nestorians went westwards, and it seems reasonable that they... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Waterrock) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26560 Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:20:25 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/26559/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html#reply-26559 Can I ask who you're using as a source of commentary/interpretation? Are you talking to Muslims while you read the Quran?
Quote:
His assumption was reinforced when Muhammad observed how the pseudo-Christians revered Mary, and he concluded that the Arabian pseudo-Christians taught that (a) the Trinity consisted of the Father, the Mother (Mary), and the Son (Jesus), and (b) the Christians believed that Jesus... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (FireGarden) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/26559 Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:48:19 GMT <![CDATA[ Surah 6 (Al-Anam) 95-105 - Signs in Nature ]]> http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/2951/t/Surah-6-Al-Anam-95-105-Signs-in-Nature.html
Verse 95 notes that Allah causes seeds to produce. It also echoes part of 3:27. The description of bringing forth the living from the dead - shown in... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Waterrock) http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/2951 Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:47:10 GMT