<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1</title>
        <link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1350/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Q:  Matthew applies Hosea 11:1 to an event in the life of Jesus, namely the sojourn in Egypt (which only Matthew mentions).  Isnt Hosea 11:1 about the nation of Israel?A:  Yes, Hosea 11:1 is about Israel, and Matthew would affirm that.  Perhaps if people knew their Old Testament better, and didnt try to make predictive fulfillments out of typological fulfillments, Matthews statements about fulfillments like this one would not appear problematic.  Matthew took for granted that his (Jewish)... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 23:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:12:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11553/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11553</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You have piqued my interest enough that I will probably buy one of Spong's books on the subject on my next run to Books-a-Million. Maybe then I will have some idea what I'm talking about!<br><br>Respectfully,<br>Franciscan Monkey ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Franciscan Monkey)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11553</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11555/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11555</link>
			<description><![CDATA[  ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Franciscan Monkey)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11555</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11552/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11552</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>There's an important difference. Most Christians are Christians because they were brought up that way. It's not likely that they would seriously question their beliefs. By the same token, 2000 years ago most Jews were Jews because they were brought up that way. They'd also have the inclination not to question their beliefs. Thus it would be difficult to convert them to Christianity. And we see this historically.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Franciscan Monkey)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11552</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11554/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11554</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>It is quite evident to me that the gospels are presenting Jesus as an actual historical figure. Matthew and Luke contain extensive genealogies. Luke claimed that his purpose was to write an accurate account of Jesus in Luke 1:1-4, and in Acts 1:1-3 he stated that there were &quot;proofs&quot; that Jesus was alive. All of the gospels placed historical, if sometimes contradictory, markers throughout the narratives. John... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Diskeyezed)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11554</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11551/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11551</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I still think there might be some grains of truth in there.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Comparable to the grains of truth in tabloids? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE HR START--><hr /><!--EZCODE HR END--><div class='signature'><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>&quot;As for the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Diskeyezed)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11551</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11550/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11550</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> Either way, the Gospels are rendered false.<hr></blockquote><br><br>I agree, though I still think there might be some grains of truth in there. <div class='signature'>If God wanted us to be Atheists we'd be born that way.</div> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rev Etherman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11550</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11549/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11549</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I've also read some things claiming that the Gospels may have originally been composed as midrash. There are good points in favor of as well as in opposition to that view (as has been noted in this thread).<br><br>My position is this: If the Gospels were originally intended as actual history, then the fact is that the authors took OT passages out of context to fabricate prophetic fulfillments, and Waterrock's arguments don't hold up, since the term used is &quot;fulfilled.&quot; On the other... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Diskeyezed)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11549</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11548/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11548</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <code>The target audience of the gospel writers was not the educated Jewish religious leaders, but the common man. Most of these people would not have been well-versed in the OT, and wouldn't have been able to cross-reference the passages easily.</code><br><br>It would have been easy enough to ask a Rabbi.<br><br><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Even today, Christian preachers, teachers, and authors are proclaiming that Jesus fulfilled specific predictive prophecies even though... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rev Etherman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11548</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11547/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11547</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The target audience of the gospel writers was not the educated Jewish religious leaders, but the common man. Most of these people would not have been well-versed in the OT, and wouldn't have been able to cross-reference the passages easily.<br><br>Notice that Matthew, by far the biggest offender of the writers in terms of falsely connecting supposed events in Jesus' life to prophecy, at times omitted where the original passage was found, or even attributed the prophecy to another OT prophet.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Franciscan Monkey)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11547</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11546/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11546</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Matthew also claims fulfillment of predictive prophecies, even if the OT authors didn't intend them to be predictive prophecies, as evidenced by his use of "to fulfill" or similar phrases.<hr></blockquote><br><br>And here a problem arises. If the Gospel writers were writing to Jewish audiences then why would they choose passages that Jews would realize weren't predictive prophecies? <div class='signature'>If God wanted us to be Atheists we'd be... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rev Etherman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11546</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11545/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11545</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Bishop Spong's work has been widely criticized from both liberal and conservative Bible scholars as reading too much into the gospels, and also for expanding the definition of what constitutes a midrash.<br><br>It is quite evident to me that the gospels are presenting Jesus as an actual historical figure. Matthew and Luke contain extensive genealogies.  Luke claimed that his purpose was to write an accurate account of Jesus in Luke 1:1-4, and in Acts 1:1-3 he stated that there were... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Franciscan Monkey)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11545</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11544/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11544</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A few weeks ago I would have argued with Waterrock over this, but I've been doing some research and I think he's right. I think he's more right than he knows. In fact, I think he's more right than he wants to be. The Jews had a type of literature known as Midrash. In it, allusions to past events were interwoven into the story to give it more meaning (pretty much the way allusions are still used in Western literature). As Bishop Spong has argued the Gospels were all written in the Midrash... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rev Etherman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11544</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 13:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11543/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html#reply-11543</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The phrase, &quot;that it might be fulfilled,&quot; indicates that it was indeed to be considered a fulfillment of predictive prophecy. If Matthew was illustrating a typological pattern, he would have used language similar to what is found in Matthew 12:40.<br><br>Respectfully,<br>Franciscan Monkey ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Franciscan Monkey)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11543</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Matthew 2:15 and Hosea 11:1 ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1350/t/Matthew-2-15-and-Hosea-11-1.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Q:  Matthew applies Hosea 11:1 to an event in the life of Jesus, namely the sojourn in Egypt (which only Matthew mentions).  Isnt Hosea 11:1 about the nation of Israel?<br><br>A:  Yes, Hosea 11:1 is about Israel, and Matthew would affirm that.  Perhaps if people knew their Old Testament better, and didnt try to make predictive fulfillments out of typological fulfillments, Matthews statements about fulfillments like this one would not appear problematic.  <br><br>Matthew took for granted that... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Waterrock)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1350</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 23:58:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>