<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel</title>
        <link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1329/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Q:  In Matthew 1:23, Matthew says that the virgin birth of Christ is a fulfillment of Isaiah 7:14.  But Isaiah 7:14 seems to be about someone else entirely.  Do these passages really have anything to do with each other?A:  Yes, but the fulfillment here is the fulfillment of a typological pattern, not the fulfillment of a direct prediction.  Lets look at Isaiah 7:14 in context:  King Ahaz -- one of the bad kings of Judah -- was very worried about a recent alliance that had been formed between... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:22:17 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:23:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11455/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html#reply-11455</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Hebrew word &quot;almah&quot;, used in Is 7:14 most accurately refers to a woman of child-bearing age.  She may or may not be a virgin.  The actual word for virgin in Hebrew is &quot;betullah&quot;, and this word is used later in Isiah and in other books.  <br><br>Of course, the Greek translators used &quot;parthenos&quot; in the Emmanual Passage, which refers to a virgin.  Ergo, the writer(s) of Matthew, eager to tie Jesus into OT prophecy and always on the lookout for what they think... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (fearthemunky)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11455</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:23:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11454/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html#reply-11454</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sorry, but this is a clear case of &quot;Matthew&quot; blowing it. <br><br>Yes, it is clear that Mt. 1:23 is referring to Is 7:14, agreed. <br><br>However, as Is 7:1 begins &quot;in the days of Ahaz...&quot;. <br><br>Emmanuel was to be born of either a virgin or a young woman as a sign to King Ahaz that when attacked by Syria and Israel, they would not be successful. <br><br>Let's assume that Isaiah was right and that Emmanuel was born in the days of Ahaz to give this king a &quot;sign&quot;.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Vampire LOGOS)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11454</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11453/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html#reply-11453</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>So, Isaiah 7:14 is not the amazing prediction that some apologists have said it is. (Isaiah did, though, correctly predict that the child would be a male and that Israel and Syria would proceed to fall apart when the Assyrians attacked.)<br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Actually there was a bit more to the prophecy than this. In your own words:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rev Etherman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11453</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:49:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11452/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html#reply-11452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Q: In Matthew 1:23, Matthew says that the virgin birth of Christ is a fulfillment of Isaiah 7:14. But Isaiah 7:14 seems to be about someone else entirely. Do these passages really have anything to do with each other?<br><br>A: Yes, but the fulfillment here is the fulfillment of a typological pattern, not the fulfillment of a direct prediction.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>The term for... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Diskeyezed)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11452</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:13:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11451/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html#reply-11451</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ahhh you must remember it was a sign of spiritual deliverance but I have talked to someone who is jewish and ask them about this this prophecie happen 700 years before jesus was born so it was already fulfilled and you are so right he did not protected his people from the romans not even close, was never called Emmanuel but no mater how you try to show someone this you will never get them to see. <br><br>&quot;If you leave the Christian Bible outside, eventually the wind and the rain<br>will... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (zipkikr1966)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11451</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:08:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11450/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html#reply-11450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ [quote]The Emmanuel child established a pattern of how God signifies His will to protect and deliver His people, and that pattern is what we see fulfilled in Matthew 1.[/quote]<br><br>But Jesus neither delivered nor protected his people (whatever you interpret his people to be). Christians and Jews suffered at the hands of Rome. Then when Rome became a Christian state it persecuted heretical Christians and Jews. For 2000 years Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others suffered for their religious... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rev Etherman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11450</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:27:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/11449/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html#reply-11449</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Dual prophecy is not biblical. If you are going to play that<br>game, when did Jesus not know right from wrong? What<br>two abhorred kings were cut off in the time of Jesus? Isaiah<br>9:5-6 refers to King Hezekiah. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (drseinfeld)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/11449</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 07:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Mt. 1:23 - Isaiah 7:14 and the Sign of Emmanuel ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1329/t/Mt-1-23-Isaiah-7-14-and-the-Sign-of-Emmanuel.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Q:  In Matthew 1:23, Matthew says that the virgin birth of Christ is a fulfillment of Isaiah 7:14.  But Isaiah 7:14 seems to be about someone else entirely.  Do these passages really have anything to do with each other?<br><br>A:  Yes, but the fulfillment here is the fulfillment of a typological pattern, not the fulfillment of a direct prediction.  Lets look at Isaiah 7:14 in context:  King Ahaz -- one of the bad kings of Judah -- was very worried about a recent alliance that had been formed... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Waterrock)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1329</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:22:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>