<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Matthew 19:9 - Except for Fornication</title>
        <link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1096/t/Matthew-19-9-Except-for-Fornication.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Q:  In Matthew 19:9, Jesus qualifies His prohibition on divorce -- divorce which precedes a remarriage to someone else -- with the phrase except for sexual immorality.  But in Mark 10:11 and Luke 16:18, theres no such exception.  Isnt this a contradiction?A:  No; Matthew makes explicit what the audiences of Mark and Luke would consider implicit.  Under the Law of Moses, a wife found guilty of adultery would be executed; this law was apparently adapted, after the Roman colonization of the... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:51:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 19:9 - Except for Fornication ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/8864/t/Matthew-19-9-Except-for-Fornication.html#reply-8864</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This issue has been a very difficult one to sort through... especially with regard to what Jesus said about remarriage of divorced persons. The explanations I have reviewed from various churches always seemed to dodge what Jesus said in Mark and Luke...<br><br>The following link provides an analysis that is completely different from what I have seen before, and it seems to me to be the most compelling I have come across thus far... I would tend to err on the side of what Jesus said in Mark... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (David from Texas)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/8864</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 19:9 - Except for Fornication ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/8863/t/Matthew-19-9-Except-for-Fornication.html#reply-8863</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>A single man having sex with a married woman and she's guilty, a single woman having sex with a married man and she's guilty. The man in both of those aren't guilty. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->Hey, don't knock it! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <div... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Argy Lacedom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/8863</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 03:57:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 19:9 - Except for Fornication ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/8862/t/Matthew-19-9-Except-for-Fornication.html#reply-8862</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Looks like a lot of christians are gonna be burning in hell with us skeptics. <br><br>I still love the sexism in the bible. <br><br>A single man having sex with a married woman and she's guilty, a single woman having sex with a married man and she's guilty. The man in both of those aren't guilty. <div class='signature'><!--EZCODE HR START--><hr /><!--EZCODE HR END--><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>&quot;If Homosexuals went back into the closet, then there would be no more Homosexuality in... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (raphjd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/8862</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 22:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Matthew 19:9 - Except for Fornication ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/reply/8861/t/Matthew-19-9-Except-for-Fornication.html#reply-8861</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This might very well still be a contradiction. If, in each of these passages, the entire intent of the prohibition was to be communicated, then we do have a contradiction. Unfortunately, we can't verify that this is not a contradiction.<br><br>Which makes me wonder why you emphatically state &quot;No&quot;, this is NOT a contradicton, when all you have is a guess, which you seem to have no problem admitting.<div class='signature'><!--EZCODE HR START--><hr /><!--EZCODE HR END-->&quot;...the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Yark Hutprancer)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/sreply/8861</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:12:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Matthew 19:9 - Except for Fornication ]]></title>
			<link>http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1096/t/Matthew-19-9-Except-for-Fornication.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Q:  In Matthew 19:9, Jesus qualifies His prohibition on divorce -- divorce which precedes a remarriage to someone else -- with the phrase except for sexual immorality.  But in Mark 10:11 and Luke 16:18, theres no such exception.  Isnt this a contradiction?<br><br>A:  No; Matthew makes explicit what the audiences of Mark and Luke would consider implicit.  Under the Law of Moses, a wife found guilty of adultery would be executed; this law was apparently adapted, after the Roman colonization of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Waterrock)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://sabdiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/1096</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>